Skip to content

Sulpicio Lines’ Woes: Too Much To Bear? UPDATED

September 6, 2008

The fighting in Mindanao, the debate over the bungled Bangsamoro Juridical Entity, and yes, the highest inflation rate in 14 years of 12.5% are hugging the headlines, along with the extended presence of ‘visiting’ American troops in Zamboanga.

So it is understandable that the tragic sinking of MV Princess of the Stars  nearly three months ago has not been on the top of our minds of late.

But there is movement on the ground with salvage work on the ship wreck due to commence in several weeks at a cost of some P350-M to the owner, Sulpicio Lines. SLI, in compliance with the conditions set by the salvage firm, Florida-based Titan Salvage, has paid 50% of the cost of the operation which will first be focused on extracting the toxic cargo still in the bowels of MV Princess of the Stars.

The Cebu-based shipping firm recently reported that it has extended bereavement and other financial aid to more than 500 or is it 600 families of the dead and missing, many of whose remains are still entombed inside MV Princess of the Stars, once the lead vessel in Sulpicio’s fleet of inter-island passenger and cargo vessels.

It’s previously been reported that Sulpicio ships carry up to 40% of the commercial cargo ( including motor vehicles) to and from the Visayas, and Mindanao, making it a truly vital cog in the supply chain, as businessman call it.

The government has been trying to project acute awareness of this reality, attempting to balance the still highly emotional issue of the recent tragedy with the economic imperatives.

It is no surprise then that a key lieutenant of President Arroyo, Elena Bautista, undersecretary for maritime affairs, has just taken over the helm of the Maritime Industry Authority. Bautista once headed the Land Transportation Frachising and Regulatory Board.

(With thanks to Jen who noted my earlier mistaken mention of Bautista being an alumna of Assumption. She graduated from the Ateneo, Jen shared.)

The MARINA, in turn has laid down a strict time-bound schedule for Sulpicio Lines to comply with stringent maritime safety standards, including retraining of its sea-going personnel, and upgraded insurance coverage.

To be fair, Sulpicio Lines appears to have shed its earlier bad handling of the crisis which including claiming the incident “was an act of God” and its seeming all-out ‘sue everyone” legal tactic.

Government itself is not blameless in the affair with the negligence of key agencies in both the micro and macro sense (the inadequate seaworthiness certifications, the ‘white elephant’ maritime emergency communications system, and PAGASA’s failure to procure properly-budgeted weather tracking and forecasting systems).

There is also the matter of the ticking environmental time bomb, given Del Monte Philippines’ highly toxic cargo of the Israeli-manufactured endosulfan pesticide which, if it leaks together with some 200,000 liter of bunker fuel still in the overturned ship, could wreak untold harm to the rich fishing waters of the Visayas.

But still, public perception, and blame-selection remains decidedly against Sulpicio even as the firm itself is reportedly struggling to literally stay afloat, operationally and financially.

Its competitors are even suspected of adding fuel to the fire by nudging negatively-slanted news and opinion reportage.

The Department of Justice’s Public Attorney’s Office (PAO) has also been ‘eager’ to stay in the news, prodding victims’ relatives to pursue damage, and criminal cases against SLI.

This writer has confirmed that the legally-required conduct of indigency certification tests for all litigants getting pro bono PAO  legal aid has been waived.

Both houses of Congress are also not done yet with their inquiries “in aid of legislation” and there is, of course, a pending Board of Marine Inquiry recommendation for the revocation of Sulpicio’s Certificate of Public Convenience (CPC).

So given these very dire circumstances, what does lie ahead for Sulpicio Lines?

It almost seems too much to bear that last Thursday Sulpicio’s MV Cotabato Princess rammed the Iloilo pier after reportedly being swept by heavy currents.

3 Comments leave one →
  1. September 6, 2008 8:37 pm

    hi Ding,

    Contrary to your assumption (pun not intended), Ma. Elena Bautista is not from Assumption. She was born and raised in Tuguegarao. She went to grade school and highschool in Tuguegarao. She went to college at Ateneo de Manila University where she took up BS Legal Management.

    I know her personally which is why I had to correct that impression. It’s unfair naman to Len hehe…

    Btw, people seem to have this negative impression of her just because she is close to the President. However, contrary to what people think of her, she is a feisty, hard-working, no non-sense person with integrity. That’s why the people at MARINA are scared of her (though, interestingly, there were only 10 employees who held a “rally” in protest of her taking over.) Suazo got replaced because he wasn’t doing his job.

    When she was first appointed as head of LTFRB, nagpicket din ang mga tao. And halos napuno ang EDSA. But she showed her worth and handled her job well. She was almost close to reducing the number of buses plying EDSA from 2,900 (at the time she took over) to the required 1,800. With Lantion, buses have increased to 5,000. Now the people at LTFRB are asking her to go back.

    Thanks!

    Jen

  2. September 6, 2008 10:53 pm

    Thanks for that, Jen/ I stand corrected po. And thank you indeed for dropping by At Midfield.

  3. September 6, 2008 10:57 pm

    Thanks din Ding!
    Welcome to Plurk! 🙂

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: